Cheat Sheet Updated! December 17, 2009 No Comments
The ON Securities Cheat Sheet has now been updated to provide a summary of the SEC’s proxy disclosure amendments at the top of the second page. . . .[to read more, click on the link above]
The ON Securities Cheat Sheet has now been updated to provide a summary of the SEC’s proxy disclosure amendments at the top of the second page. . . .[to read more, click on the link above]
On December 16, 2009, the SEC adopted its amendments to the proxy disclosure rules – see the press release and the full 129-page release that includes the text of the rules. The release has led to some confusion about when the new rules are effective – the release mentions an effective date of February 28, 2010, but it does not specify exactly what that means. I agree with Mark Borges in the Proxy Disclosure Blog (subscription site), who assumes that the amendments apply to proxy statements and other applicable filings on or after that date. . . . In my last post, I mentioned one of the “sleepers” in the rules. But I think there may be another one. . . . [to read more, click on the link above]
As many of you know, the SEC announced yesterday that it will hold an open meeting on Wednesday, December 16 for the purpose of adopting its proposed amendments to the proxy disclosure rules. . . . The two questions on everyone’s mind: When will the rules be effective? And what changes will the SEC make to the proposals? . . . . Assuming the final rules are similar to the proposals, many public companies will be busy over the next few weeks preparing for the new disclosures. . . . . There are some “sleepers” too . . . .[to read more, click on the link above]
I’ve just finished three and a half very interesting days at the NASPP Annual Conference and the Proxy Disclosure Conference sponsored by CompensationStandards.com in San Francisco. Aside from an unexpectedly big crowd and some great food, attendees encountered some interesting updates. . . . Shelley Parratt, Director of Corporation Finance of the SEC, addressed the group, and there were two main news items. First, she previewed the currently proposed amendments to the proxy disclosure rules. She didn’t address when the amendments would be considered, but stated that the new rules “may well” be in place for the 2010 proxy season . . . . Second, apart from the new rules, Parratt discussed compliance with the proxy disclosure rules adopted in 2007 and indicated that the SEC staff will take a more assertive (aggressive?) posture in its comment process. . . .[to read more, click on the link above]
Early November finds us in a kind of limbo – those of us who advise public companies on governance and compensation matters are waiting for something big to happen. But there’s plenty of smaller stuff to report on – although most of these items present more questions than answers . . . . On November 4, SEC Chairman gave a speech addressing current regulatory developments. She described the proxy disclosure rules but did not address when they would be adopted or considered. . . . Rep. Maxine Waters has proposed an amendment to the Investor Protection Act of 2009 . . . . [to read more, click on the link above]
Last week, the Twin Cities Chapter of the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals hosted a presentation on hot topics in executive compensation . . . . One of the hot topics covered by the presenters was compensation risk analysis. They presented a very high-level summary of steps a company should consider . . . . As I discussed previously, if the SEC adopts its proposed amendments to the proxy rules, each public company will be required to disclose in its proxy statement how its overall compensation policies for employees (including compensation of non-executives) create incentives that can affect the company’s risk level, and its management of risk. . . . Public companies should start thinking about the analysis that must be completed . . . . [to read more, click on the link above]
The past few weeks have been fairly slow in terms of new developments in securities law, corporate governance and executive compensation. However, summer’s over, and I’m expecting a flurry in the next few weeks. Take a look back at the ON Securities Cheat Sheet – a lot of these developments are likely to change as we head into the fall . . . . Last weekend I saw my all-time favorite film about blogging – okay, maybe the only film I have seen about blogging. “Julie & Julia” follows two parallel true stories . . . . I watched Julie’s story with my “blogger hat” on, and I tried to figure out what made her blog successful. . . .[to read more, click on the title above].
It’s a pretty good bet that non-binding shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay”) will be adopted this year and will become mandatory for public companies, probably starting with the 2010 proxy season. . . . So, what does Say-on-Pay look like in practice, and what is the likely outcome of the shareholder vote? . . . . Assuming Say-on-Pay is required to be on the ballot in 2010, what should companies do now? . . . .We have just posted an updated version of the ON Securities Cheat Sheet under the Resources listing on the home page of this Blog. . . . [To read more, click on the title above.]
Is your head spinning from the number of new developments in corporate governance and compensation reform? Are you dizzy from trying to remember whether “say-on-severance” is part of the Schumer Bill or the Treasury Department’s white paper? Is your heart racing from trying to keep track of the progress of shareholder access proposals? . . . We have just the answer – the ON Securities Cheat Sheet will cure what ails you. The Cheat Sheet is a one stop shop for “capsule summaries” of each bill and regulatory proposal being considered. These capsules are sure to make you feel better – and in the spirit of health care reform, this remedy is ABSOLUTELY FREE! . . . . [To read more, click on the Title above.]
. . . . The SEC’s newly proposed amendments to its disclosure rules, issued on July 10, 2009 . . . , would require additional disclosures about compensation consultants, . . . . The SEC’s proposed amendments would also require: . . . . (read more) – Marty Rosenbaum